[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201074#comment-16201074
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
-----------------------------------
I feel like the maybeFlushBefore, maybeFlushAfter bits need a little more
thinking. Seems pretty arbitrary to only check the firstCommand; maybe we
should completely separate command-specific flush trigger from general purpose
flush trigger? Then you could check command-level flushing on each command, if
that's even still necessary.
> Remove the usage of workqueue for Overseer
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11443
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Cao Manh Dat
> Assignee: Cao Manh Dat
> Attachments: SOLR-11443.patch, SOLR-11443.patch
>
>
> If we can remove the usage of workqueue, We can save a lot of IO blocking in
> Overseer, hence boost performance a lot.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
