I think it's a better approach than rewriting Solr's internals. Eg, small development steps could be taken, using the knowledge learned from Solr's facet system. Eg, caching and intersecting bit sets would be an easy-ish first step?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I believe people are already looking into that but I am not sure. > sounds reasonable to me but I think its going to be lots of work > > simon > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Jason Rutherglen > <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Are we going the direction of creating full facet features outside of >> Solr? Eg, we have UIF extrapolated out, we can probably make a module >> for bit set intersections as well. In the process the faceting will >> go per-segment. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
