There is already an issue open for this: LUCENE-3079 As the issues describes, the faceting in Solr relies on the schema (and off course the UIF). So having the noting of a FieldType in the facet module would be very helpful for selecting the right facet implementation. Currently in Solr there is only one facet method for field facet that work per-segment, but I think in the end we would want all facet types and methods to work on a per-segment basis.
Martijn On 13 June 2011 23:47, Jason Rutherglen <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's a better approach than rewriting Solr's internals. Eg, > small development steps could be taken, using the knowledge learned > from Solr's facet system. Eg, caching and intersecting bit sets would > be an easy-ish first step? > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Simon Willnauer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I believe people are already looking into that but I am not sure. > > sounds reasonable to me but I think its going to be lots of work > > > > simon > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Jason Rutherglen > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Are we going the direction of creating full facet features outside of > >> Solr? Eg, we have UIF extrapolated out, we can probably make a module > >> for bit set intersections as well. In the process the faceting will > >> go per-segment. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
