[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16218010#comment-16218010
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7997:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 42717d5f4bbed46009f11a86f307541a19fd7fb5 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/master from [~rcmuir]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=42717d5 ]
LUCENE-7997: More sanity testing of similarities
> More sanity testing of similarities
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7997
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7997.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch,
> LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch,
> LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch,
> LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch,
> LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch
>
>
> LUCENE-7993 is a potential optimization that we could only apply if the
> similarity is an increasing functions of {{freq}} (all other things like DF
> and length being equal). This sounds like a very reasonable requirement for a
> similarity, so we should test it in the base similarity test case and maybe
> move broken similarities to sandbox?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
