[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16218204#comment-16218204 ]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7997: -------------------------------------- Thanks Robert! > More sanity testing of similarities > ----------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-7997 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7997 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: master (8.0) > > Attachments: LUCENE-7997.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, > LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, > LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, > LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, > LUCENE-7997_wip.patch, LUCENE-7997_wip.patch > > > LUCENE-7993 is a potential optimization that we could only apply if the > similarity is an increasing functions of {{freq}} (all other things like DF > and length being equal). This sounds like a very reasonable requirement for a > similarity, so we should test it in the base similarity test case and maybe > move broken similarities to sandbox? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org