Neither of those Solr fixes are earth shatteringly important, they've both been around for quite a while. I don't think it's urgent to include them.
That said, they're pretty simple and isolated so worth doing if Jim is willing. But not worth straining much. I was just clearing out some backlog over vacation. Strictly up to you Jim. Erick On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 6:54 AM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11809 is in progress, should > be easy and I think definitely worth backporting > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:52 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Looking at the changelog, 7.3 has 3 bug fixes for now: LUCENE-8077, >> SOLR-11783 and SOLR-11555. The Lucene change doesn't seem worth >> backporting, but maybe the Solr changes should? >> >> Le ven. 5 janv. 2018 à 12:40, jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >>> Hi, >>> We discovered a bad bug in 7x that affects indices created in 6x with >>> Lucene54DocValues format. The SortedNumericDocValues created with this >>> format have a bug when advanceExact is used, the values retrieved for the >>> docs when advanceExact returns true are invalid (the pointer to the values >>> is not updated): >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8117 >>> This affects all indices created in 6x with sorted numeric doc values so >>> I wanted to ask if anyone objects to a bugfix release for 7.2 (7.2.1). I >>> also volunteer to be the release manager for this one if it is accepted. >>> >>> Jim >>> >> > > -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www. > solrenterprisesearchserver.com >
