Erick, I'll merge SOLR-11783 and SOLR-11555 in the 7.2 branch. Though I am waiting for SOLR-11771 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11771> and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11809 to be resolved and I'll create a candidate for the release.
Cheers, Jim 2018-01-06 18:59 GMT+01:00 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>: > Not sure how performance tests in the unit tests would be interpreted. If > I run the same suite on two different machines how do I compare the > numbers? > > Or are you thinking of having some tests so someone can check out > different versions of Solr and run the perf tests on a single machine, > perhaps using bisect to pinpoint when something changed? > > I'm not opposed at all, just trying to understand how one would go about > using such tests. > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:09 PM, S G <sg.online.em...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just curious to know, does the test suite include some performance test >> also? >> I would like to know the performance impact of using pints vs tints or >> ints etc. >> If they are not there, I can try to add some tests for the same. >> >> Thanks >> SG >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Đạt Cao Mạnh <caomanhdat...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I will work on SOLR-11771 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11771> today, It is a >>> simple fix and will be great if it get fixed in 7.2.1 >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:23 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Neither of those Solr fixes are earth shatteringly important, they've >>>> both been around for quite a while. I don't think it's urgent to include >>>> them. >>>> >>>> That said, they're pretty simple and isolated so worth doing if Jim is >>>> willing. But not worth straining much. I was just clearing out some backlog >>>> over vacation. >>>> >>>> Strictly up to you Jim. >>>> >>>> Erick >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 6:54 AM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11809 is in progress, >>>>> should be easy and I think definitely worth backporting >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:52 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking at the changelog, 7.3 has 3 bug fixes for now: LUCENE-8077, >>>>>> SOLR-11783 and SOLR-11555. The Lucene change doesn't seem worth >>>>>> backporting, but maybe the Solr changes should? >>>>>> >>>>>> Le ven. 5 janv. 2018 à 12:40, jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com> >>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> We discovered a bad bug in 7x that affects indices created in 6x >>>>>>> with Lucene54DocValues format. The SortedNumericDocValues created with >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> format have a bug when advanceExact is used, the values retrieved for >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> docs when advanceExact returns true are invalid (the pointer to the >>>>>>> values >>>>>>> is not updated): >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8117 >>>>>>> This affects all indices created in 6x with sorted numeric doc >>>>>>> values so I wanted to ask if anyone objects to a bugfix release for 7.2 >>>>>>> (7.2.1). I also volunteer to be the release manager for this one if it >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> accepted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jim >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >>>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >>>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >
