[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054359#comment-13054359
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2793:
--------------------------------------------
I took quick look @ the branch -- it's looking good! Some small stuff:
* Should IOContext and MergeInfo be in oal.store not .index?
* I think SegmentMerger should receive an IOCtx from its caller, and
then apss that to all the IO ops it invokes? But the code has a
nocommit about tripping an assert -- which one?
* I think on flush IOContext should include num docs and estimated
segment size (we can roughly pull this from RAM used for the
segment), but we should include comment that this is only approx.
* Somehow, lucene/contrib/demo/data is deleted on the branch. We
should check if anything else is missing!
> Directory createOutput and openInput should take an IOContext
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2793
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/store
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Varun Thacker
> Labels: gsoc2011, lucene-gsoc-11, mentor
> Attachments: LUCENE-2793-nrt.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch,
> LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch,
> LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch,
> LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch,
> LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch, LUCENE-2793.patch
>
>
> Today for merging we pass down a larger readBufferSize than for searching
> because we get better performance.
> I think we should generalize this to a class (IOContext), which would hold
> the buffer size, but then could hold other flags like DIRECT (bypass OS's
> buffer cache), SEQUENTIAL, etc.
> Then, we can make the DirectIOLinuxDirectory fully usable because we would
> only use DIRECT/SEQUENTIAL during merging.
> This will require fixing how IW pools readers, so that a reader opened for
> merging is not then used for searching, and vice/versa. Really, it's only
> all the open file handles that need to be different -- we could in theory
> share del docs, norms, etc, if that were somehow possible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
