David Smiley commented on SOLR-12045:

I'm not sure where best to bring this up but I'm concerned about all the ways 
there are to compute facets in Solr.  Each needs to be maintained, documented, 
and then in the end Solr is more complex -- albeit maybe more capable though i 
really don't know right now where the gaps are.  It would love to see some 
particular use-cases compared in terms of syntax and performance, and of course 
a better understanding of extra capabilities unique to each.  The primary 
contenders are the JSON-Facets module & this Analytics module.  Of course this 
is wishful thinking; I can't implore anyone to do anything.  Well except for my 
kids but they are not up to this task yet LOL :-)  I've seen presentations on 
both individually that made each out to be awesome but at no times were they 

> Move Analytics Component from contrib to core
> ---------------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-12045
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12045
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: master (8.0)
>            Reporter: Houston Putman
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: master (8.0)
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
> The Analytics Component currently lives in contrib. Since it includes no 
> external dependencies, there is no harm in moving it into core solr.
> The analytics component would be included as a default search component and 
> the analytics handler (currently only used for analytics shard requests, 
> might be transitioned to handle user requests in the future) would be 
> included as an implicit handler.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to