[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16536963#comment-16536963
]
Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-12297 at 7/9/18 2:19 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t plan on doing any of this piece mail. If it goes in, it will be like
SolrCloud and be a full switch on a major version. Basically my branch is way
better than the main branch. Either people will want to switch to it or they
won’t.
Also any sort of review beyond high level comments now won’t be very useful.
This isn’t even close to done.
was (Author: [email protected]):
I don’t plan on doing any of this price mail. If it goes in, it will be like
SolrCloud and be a full switch on a major version. Basically my branch is way
better than the main branch. Either people will want to switch to it or they
won’t.
> Add Http2SolrClient, capable of HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and asynchronous requests.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12297
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12297
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: starburst-ivy-fixes.patch
>
>
> Blocking or async support as well as HTTP2 compatible with multiplexing.
> Once it supports enough and is stable, replace internal usage, allowing
> async, and eventually move to HTTP2 connector and allow multiplexing. Could
> support HTTP1.1 and HTTP2 on different ports depending on state of the world
> then.
> The goal of the client itself is to work against HTTP1.1 or HTTP2 with
> minimal or no code path differences and the same for async requests (should
> initially work for both 1.1 and 2 and share majority of code).
> The client should also be able to replace HttpSolrClient and plug into the
> other clients the same way.
> I doubt it would make sense to keep ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient eventually
> though.
> I evaluated some clients and while there are a few options, I went with
> Jetty's HttpClient. It's more mature than Apache HttpClient's support (in 5
> beta) and we would have to update to a new API for Apache HttpClient anyway.
> Meanwhile, the Jetty guys have been very supportive of helping Solr with any
> issues and I like having the client and server from the same project.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
