[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16548267#comment-16548267
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-12555:
----------------------------------------
[^SOLR-12555.txt] Attaching a file with all the instances of this I could find
with some simple grep. There's a lot more of it than I anticipated. Will
probably have to get to this in a piece-meal fashion when I get the time.
> Replace try-fail-catch test patterns
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12555
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12555
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Test
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Tests
> Affects Versions: master (8.0)
> Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
> Assignee: Jason Gerlowski
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: SOLR-12555.txt
>
>
> I recently added some test code through SOLR-12427 which used the following
> test anti-pattern:
> {code}
> try {
> actionExpectedToThrowException();
> fail("I expected this to throw an exception, but it didn't");
> catch (Exception e) {
> assertOnThrownException(e);
> }
> {code}
> Hoss (rightfully) objected that this should instead be written using the
> formulation below, which is clearer and more concise.
> {code}
> SolrException e = expectThrows(() -> {...});
> {code}
> We should remove many of these older formulations where it makes sense. Many
> of them were written before {{expectThrows}} was introduced, and having the
> old style assertions around makes it easier for them to continue creeping in.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
