Thanks! On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:49 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 to investigate, I suspect there is a lot of room for improvement. :) FYI I > opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8448 yesterday. > > Le mer. 8 août 2018 à 08:42, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> Just wanted others to be aware. The recent changes made to Lucene made >> some queries incredibly fast (yay): >> >> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/AndHighHigh.html >> >> while others seem to suffer: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/AndMedOrHighHigh.html >> >> I actually hit the latter case when doing some benchmarking around ram >> directory and was puzzled for a while about why the software dropped >> 2x in performance between commits that didn't do anything. >> >> The queries I use are fairly unusual (complex Booleans); I also pinged >> Adrien in private to verify my and my computer's sanity. :) The commit >> introducing the change is: >> >> 99dbe9368 LUCENE-8060: IndexSearcher's search and searchAfter methods >> now only compute total hit counts accurately up to 1,000. >> >> Again: I don't think it's the usual "human user" query case, but may >> be worth investigating (and I'm not throwing it on your shoulders, >> Adrien! ;) >> >> Dawid >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
