Github user moshebla commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/416#discussion_r208813471
--- Diff:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/response/transform/TestChildDocTransformer.java
---
@@ -242,10 +242,10 @@ private void testChildDocNonStoredDVFields() throws
Exception {
"fl", "*,[child parentFilter=\"subject:parentDocument\"]"), test1);
assertJQ(req("q", "*:*", "fq", "subject:\"parentDocument\" ",
- "fl", "subject,[child parentFilter=\"subject:parentDocument\"
childFilter=\"title:foo\"]"), test2);
+ "fl", "id,_childDocuments_,subject,intDvoDefault,[child
parentFilter=\"subject:parentDocument\" childFilter=\"title:foo\"]"), test2);
--- End diff --
I was thinking about what you said, and perhaps we could add the old format
using if the user did not index the field meta-data. I prefer having a flag,
since the user can query separate two collections and get the same output if
desired, instead of having to deal with two different XML formats.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
