[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16611163#comment-16611163
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-11836:
---------------------------------------
In that particular spot there are no array allocations made. It may be that in
the lower level facet collecting code that array allocations are made based on
limit. We could dig and see how the limit is being used and/or also ping Yonik
and see what he thinks.
[[email protected]], do you feel it's safe to be setting the facet bucket
limit to Integer.MAX_VALUE?
> Use -1 in bucketSizeLimit to get all facets, analogous to the JSON facet API
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11836
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: streaming expressions
> Reporter: Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
> Priority: Major
> Labels: facet, streaming
> Attachments: SOLR-11836.patch
>
>
> Currently, to retrieve all buckets using the streaming expressions facet
> function, the {{bucketSizeLimit}} parameter must have a high enough value so
> that all results will be included. Compare this with the JSON facet API,
> where you can use {{"limit": -1}} to achieve this. It would help if such a
> possibility existed.
> [Issue 11236|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11236] is related.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
