On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Chris Hostetter <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that the back-compat on classes in test-framework should be loose, > and we should be allowed to break compat anytime it helps improve our test > coverage, but we should at least *mention* in CHANGES when we break it. > > right? Not loose, non-existant. -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
