There's no harm in mentioning it, Robert. This is something people may not be aware of, so consider it a golden nugget of information about Java7 behavior hidden in CHANGES. :)
Dawid On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Chris Hostetter > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree that the back-compat on classes in test-framework should be loose, >> and we should be allowed to break compat anytime it helps improve our test >> coverage, but we should at least *mention* in CHANGES when we break it. >> >> right? > > Not loose, non-existant. > > > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
