[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16628821#comment-16628821
 ] 

Lucene/Solr QA commented on SOLR-12652:
---------------------------------------

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m 
26s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  1m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} Release audit (RAT) {color} | 
{color:green}  1m 20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} Check forbidden APIs {color} | 
{color:green}  1m 20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} Validate source patterns {color} | 
{color:green}  1m 20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 57m 
16s{color} | {color:green} core in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 62m 25s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | SOLR-12652 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12941309/SOLR-12652.patch |
| Optional Tests |  compile  javac  unit  ratsources  checkforbiddenapis  
validatesourcepatterns  |
| uname | Linux lucene1-us-west 4.4.0-130-generic #156~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu 
Jun 14 13:51:47 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | ant |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-SOLR-Build/sourcedir/dev-tools/test-patch/lucene-solr-yetus-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / 667b829 |
| ant | version: Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.3 compiled on July 24 2018 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_172 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SOLR-Build/190/testReport/ |
| modules | C: solr solr/core U: solr |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SOLR-Build/190/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> SolrMetricManager.overridableRegistryName should be removed; it doesn't work
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12652
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12652
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: metrics
>    Affects Versions: 7.1
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-12652.patch, SOLR-12652.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The {{SolrMetricManager.overridableRegistryName()}} method is a great idea 
> but unfortunately in practice I've found it doesn't really work; it seems 
> fundamentally flawed.  +I wish it could work+.  The main issue I think is 
> that the callers of SMM.registerGauge/registerMetric assumes it can place a 
> gauge/metric and have it be the only once there (force==true).  But it won't 
> be if it's shared.  
> Another problem is in at least one of the reporters -- 
> {{JmxMetricsReporter.JmxListener#registerMBean}} will get in a race condition 
> to remove an already-registered MBean but in the process of removing it, 
> it'll already get removed concurrently by some other core working on the same 
> name.  This results in {{javax.management.InstanceNotFoundException}} logged 
> as a warning; nothing serious.  But I suspect conceptually there is a problem 
> since which MBean should "win"?  Shrug.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to