[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16744943#comment-16744943
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8642:
---------------------------------------
This looks like it might have broken compilation on 7x and 8x?
*11:35:34* common.compile-core:*11:35:34* [mkdir] Created dir:
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/apache+lucene-solr+branch_8x/lucene/build/test-framework/classes/java*11:35:34*
[javac] Compiling 196 source files to
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/apache+lucene-solr+branch_8x/lucene/build/test-framework/classes/java*11:35:35*
[javac]
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/apache+lucene-solr+branch_8x/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/RamUsageTester.java:160:
error: cannot find symbol*11:35:35* [javac] } else if (ob
instanceof ByteBuffer) {*11:35:35* [javac]
^*11:35:35* [javac] symbol: class ByteBuffer*11:35:35* [javac]
location: class RamUsageTester*11:35:35* [javac]
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/apache+lucene-solr+branch_8x/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/RamUsageTester.java:162:
error: cannot find symbol*11:35:35* [javac] totalSize +=
byteArraySize(((ByteBuffer) ob).capacity());*11:35:35* [javac]
^*11:35:35* [javac] symbol: class
ByteBuffer*11:35:35* [javac] location: class RamUsageTester*11:35:35*
[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.*11:35:35*
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.*11:35:35*
[javac] 2 errors*11:35:35* *11:35:35* BUILD FAILED
> RamUsageTester.sizeOf ignores arrays and collections if --illegal-access=deny
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8642
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8642
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Dawid Weiss
> Assignee: Dawid Weiss
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: master (9.0)
>
>
> We have a silent fall-through on catch clause there if a field is
> inaccessible. This causes all collections to not be recursively descended
> into.
> We could hack it so that collection objects are counted "manually". Or we
> could propagate illegal access exception from ram tester, detect which tests/
> objects do try to measure collection objects and either remove them (if it's
> not possible to measure accurately) or change them (if it is possible to
> estimate the size in a different way).
> Looking for feedback on this one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
