[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16822005#comment-16822005 ]
Lucene/Solr QA commented on SOLR-12697: --------------------------------------- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 10s{color} | {color:red} SOLR-12697 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Creating_the_patch_file for help. {color} | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | JIRA Issue | SOLR-12697 | | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12950561/SOLR-12697.patch | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SOLR-Build/376/console | | Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0 http://yetus.apache.org | This message was automatically generated. > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR > Reporter: Stanislav Livotov > Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org