On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bernd Fehling <bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Hmm, it may be not an blocker issue but still has a NPE which isn't > good publicity for solr/lucene. > This is already fixed with a patch attached to SOLR-2726. > And yes, it is fixed with its init(). > So where is the problem?
As i explained both in this thread and on the jira issue, the proper fix is for the logic to be in *SolrSpellChecker*, since its the one that has this 'analyzer' variable. then the logic doesnt need to be duplicated across n implementing classes (AbstractLuceneSpellChecker, DirectSpellChecker, Suggester, ...) -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
