Jan, I think that is something that merits its own mail thread or jira for broader community participation.
On Mon, 18 Nov, 2019, 5:19 AM Jan Høydahl, <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > I added this bullet point under "Community": > > > - Should we adopt a formal decision process for proposing major > changes/APIs to Solr, aka "Solr Implementation Proposal (SIP)"? > - See proposal from Jörn Franke in dev@ > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/335f7cf581d799e64969821f3e3febf571edc60f07aa02c1193a81ca@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E> > referring > to KIP > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals> > and FLIP > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals> > > > Example: With SIP we would probably not have ended up with three > overlapping facet/stats implementations without a migration plan :) > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > 17. nov. 2019 kl. 15:13 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: > > The meeting will be held on Wednesday at 11am PST (2pm EST). I'll send a > calendar invite tomorrow to those that used the Doodle poll. > The agenda is here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2019-11+Meeting+on+SolrCloud+and+project+health > Edit it if you wish. If you can't (e.g. you are not a committer), then > maybe reply here to offer a suggestion. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:56 PM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am proposing a virtual "Solr committer meeting" next week to discuss >> the concerns and ideas Mark Miller has raised recently. The scope of >> conversation of this one is not the other wonderful things people are >> working on (e.g. new plugins architecture), though I would *love* to have >> future virtual committer meetings that are open-ended to discuss all manner >> of things on our minds. >> >> Why? (A) I felt the committer meeting at Activate this year was >> fantastically productive (B) I love opportunities to see/hear from my >> awesome virtual colleagues (C) Mark raised issues of grave concern to our >> community >> >> When exactly is this?: I'm using a "Doodle poll" to determine an optimal >> time slot. For the link to the poll, go to the ASF Slack, #solr-dev >> channel, and you will see it. You could also email me directly for it. >> >> For this virtual committer meeting and future ones: >> * This is in the spirit of committer meetings co-located with >> conferences. I recall that ASF policy says that no "decisions" can be made >> in such a venue. We make decisions on this dev list and indirectly via >> JIRA out in the open and with the opportunity for anyone to comment. >> * Who: Committer-only or by invitation >> * Video chat with option of audio dial-in. This time I will use Google >> Hangout. >> * Recorded for those invited only. I'll dispose of the recording a week >> after. The intention is for those who cannot be there due to a scheduling >> conflict to see/hear what was said. I have the ability to do this >> recording via Salesforce's G-Suite subscription. >> * Published notes: I (or someone) will take written meeting notes that >> are ultimately published for anyone to see (not restricted to those >> invited). They will be transmitted to the dev list. >> >> Thanks everyone. I hope we do more of these! And I hope non-committers >> don't feel slighted; the published notes is a great time to make your voice >> heard here! I'm open to suggestions. >> >> ~ David Smiley >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> > >
