What's the medium for this? Is somebody going to make a webex/zoom/meet/whatever link? I'd like to make sure I have the right tools installed and will do my best to join from airport wifi.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 2:49 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > I view Jörn’s SIP proposal as a way for tighter gate keeping of future > major changes, helping maintain hard fought stability and speed. > > Jan Høydahl > > 18. nov. 2019 kl. 06:26 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: > > > This particular committer's meeting has a particular subject/theme. So as > Erick indicated, while all committers are invited, I think if you're not > interested in the subject then I'm sure you can find a better use of your > time. The "Solr Implementation Proposal" could fit in I suppose, but not > Gradle (sorry Erick). > > Lets have another committer meeting in the near future too to discuss > whatever Gradle and whatever. I look forward to having more opportunities > to collaborate with more direct synchronous conversation. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 8:29 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Jan, I think that is something that merits its own mail thread or jira >> for broader community participation. >> >> On Mon, 18 Nov, 2019, 5:19 AM Jan Høydahl, <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: >> >>> I added this bullet point under "Community": >>> >>> >>> - Should we adopt a formal decision process for proposing major >>> changes/APIs to Solr, aka "Solr Implementation Proposal (SIP)"? >>> - See proposal from Jörn Franke in dev@ >>> >>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/335f7cf581d799e64969821f3e3febf571edc60f07aa02c1193a81ca@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E> >>> referring >>> to KIP >>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals> >>> and FLIP >>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals> >>> >>> >>> Example: With SIP we would probably not have ended up with three >>> overlapping facet/stats implementations without a migration plan :) >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>> >>> 17. nov. 2019 kl. 15:13 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> The meeting will be held on Wednesday at 11am PST (2pm EST). I'll send >>> a calendar invite tomorrow to those that used the Doodle poll. >>> The agenda is here: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2019-11+Meeting+on+SolrCloud+and+project+health >>> Edit it if you wish. If you can't (e.g. you are not a committer), then >>> maybe reply here to offer a suggestion. >>> >>> ~ David Smiley >>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:56 PM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I am proposing a virtual "Solr committer meeting" next week to discuss >>>> the concerns and ideas Mark Miller has raised recently. The scope of >>>> conversation of this one is not the other wonderful things people are >>>> working on (e.g. new plugins architecture), though I would *love* to have >>>> future virtual committer meetings that are open-ended to discuss all manner >>>> of things on our minds. >>>> >>>> Why? (A) I felt the committer meeting at Activate this year was >>>> fantastically productive (B) I love opportunities to see/hear from my >>>> awesome virtual colleagues (C) Mark raised issues of grave concern to our >>>> community >>>> >>>> When exactly is this?: I'm using a "Doodle poll" to determine an >>>> optimal time slot. For the link to the poll, go to the ASF Slack, >>>> #solr-dev channel, and you will see it. You could also email me directly >>>> for it. >>>> >>>> For this virtual committer meeting and future ones: >>>> * This is in the spirit of committer meetings co-located with >>>> conferences. I recall that ASF policy says that no "decisions" can be made >>>> in such a venue. We make decisions on this dev list and indirectly via >>>> JIRA out in the open and with the opportunity for anyone to comment. >>>> * Who: Committer-only or by invitation >>>> * Video chat with option of audio dial-in. This time I will use Google >>>> Hangout. >>>> * Recorded for those invited only. I'll dispose of the recording a >>>> week after. The intention is for those who cannot be there due to a >>>> scheduling conflict to see/hear what was said. I have the ability to do >>>> this recording via Salesforce's G-Suite subscription. >>>> * Published notes: I (or someone) will take written meeting notes that >>>> are ultimately published for anyone to see (not restricted to those >>>> invited). They will be transmitted to the dev list. >>>> >>>> Thanks everyone. I hope we do more of these! And I hope >>>> non-committers don't feel slighted; the published notes is a great time to >>>> make your voice heard here! I'm open to suggestions. >>>> >>>> ~ David Smiley >>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>> >>> >>>
