+1

SUCCESS! [1:23:10.623120]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 7:06 AM Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've got
>
>   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest
> -Dtests.method=testTimeCat -Dtests.seed=D05700662AF3B95B
> -Dtests.locale=en-GB -Dtests.timezone=Australia/North -Dt
>
> ests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1
>
> [00:42:59.083] FAILURE 29.4s J1 |
> DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.testTimeCat <<<
>
>    > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<10> but was:<9>
>
>    >    at
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([D05700662AF3B95B:E9AF41D56AD2F530]:0)
>
>    >    at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>
>    >    at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
>
>    >    at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
>
>    >    at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
>
>    >    at
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.assertCatTimeInvariants(DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.java:678)
>
>    >    at
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.testTimeCat(DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.java:196)
>
> which didn't reproduce to me when I retry.
>
> +0
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:23 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.4.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.4.0-RC1-revc91d36f50efb62e55bcc3a1adc0442b207018670
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.4.0-RC1-revc91d36f50efb62e55bcc3a1adc0442b207018670
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 3 working days, i.e. until 2019-12-20
>> 19:00 UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
>

Reply via email to