I'v ported the commit
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=221d4ed

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:59 AM Noble Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Adrien.
> My apologies for the inconvenience .
>
> --Noble
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:04 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Cassandra for finding this missing commit. I'll start a new RC 
> > tomorrow morning EU time.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:21 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> If there is a respin, maybe the Changenotes (for Solr) can be fixed too:
> >> 1) First entry under Upgrade Notes is missing JIRA and probably does
> >> not need to include the full class path
> >> 2) Optimization section can probably be skipped as it just has "no
> >> changes" entry
> >> 3) Couple of JIRAs are missing contributor attributions (is it
> >> compulsory? I don't know.)
> >>
> >> Also Lucene's one under "build" section is missing one JIRA number.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>    Alex.
> >>
> >> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 14:20, Noble Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'm so sorry to come at this moment and tell you that one of the
> >> > critical bug fixes I made to master was not ported to 8x and 8.4.
> >> >
> >> > This breaks a critical functionality of package loading feature.
> >> > Is it possible to do a respin?
> >> > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/f98555854cbdb9d396c34a93fde9c1610df74882#diff-04f78a3e0960a743f6b4267e2d0f7f49
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 6:11 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi Gus,
> >> > >
> >> > > If the test is flaky, would you mind annotating it with "@BadApple"? 
> >> > > It will make sure this test doesn't get in the way of building or 
> >> > > voting on a release until the test is fixed.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:52 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Hi Mkhail, This is a known flakey test (mine, it's on my to do list). 
> >> > >> Seems to have got slightly more flakey recently possibly because 
> >> > >> other tests have got better at using up CPU?. The flake here is that 
> >> > >> the code in the test didn't manage to wait long enough before running 
> >> > >> the assertion. This failure does not represent an issue with anything 
> >> > >> other than the test.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:06 AM Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> 
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I've got
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> >> > >>> -Dtestcase=DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest 
> >> > >>> -Dtests.method=testTimeCat -Dtests.seed=D05700662AF3B95B 
> >> > >>> -Dtests.locale=en-GB -Dtests.timezone=Australia/North -Dt
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> ests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> [00:42:59.083] FAILURE 29.4s J1 | 
> >> > >>> DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.testTimeCat <<<
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>    > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<10> but 
> >> > >>> was:<9>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>    >    at 
> >> > >>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([D05700662AF3B95B:E9AF41D56AD2F530]:0)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>    >    at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>    >    at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>    >    at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>    >    at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>    >    at 
> >> > >>> org.apache.solr.update.processor.DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.assertCatTimeInvariants(DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.java:678)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>    >    at 
> >> > >>> org.apache.solr.update.processor.DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.testTimeCat(DimensionalRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.java:196)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> which didn't reproduce to me when I retry.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> +0
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:23 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> 
> >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.4.0
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.4.0-RC1-revc91d36f50efb62e55bcc3a1adc0442b207018670
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.4.0-RC1-revc91d36f50efb62e55bcc3a1adc0442b207018670
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> The vote will be open for at least 3 working days, i.e. until 
> >> > >>>> 2019-12-20 19:00 UTC.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> [ ] +1  approve
> >> > >>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> > >>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Here is my +1
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> --
> >> > >>>> Adrien
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> Sincerely yours
> >> > >>> Mikhail Khludnev
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> >> > >> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Adrien
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >> > Noble Paul
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to