Also this coould be a backport candidate: SOLR-14317 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> HttpClusterStateProvider 
throws exception when only one node down

Jan

> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 22:29 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>:
> 
> I plan to merge this to branch_8_5
> 
>    SOLR-14359 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> Admin UI has 
> "Select an option" for collections and cores drop-downs
> 
> Jan
> 
>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 14:15 skrev jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:jim.feren...@gmail.com>>:
>> 
>> +1, thanks Ignacio.
>> I merged the fix for LUCENE-9300 
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9300> and backported to the 
>> 8.5 branch.
>> 
>> Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 21:48, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> My general take on this is that it's ok to upgrade a dependency in a patch 
>> release if the dependency upgrade itself is a new patch release of the same 
>> minor version. The changelog of Tika 1.24 seems to include not only bug 
>> fixes but also some enhancements[1], so I'd rather do a 8.6 release in the 
>> near future than backport this dependency upgrade to 8.5.
>> 
>> [1] https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html 
>> <https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html>
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:33 PM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Should we consider backporting SOLR-14367 (the most recent Tika upgrade)? It 
>> addresses a CVE in Tika, and while I think we usually avoid changing 3rd 
>> party component versions in patch releases, but maybe we should in this 
>> case? The upgrade also looks like it was pretty straightforward (drop-in 
>> replacement).
>> 
>> Cassandra
>> On Apr 2, 2020, 12:47 PM -0500, Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:iver...@gmail.com>>, wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The main 
>>> motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a serious 
>>> bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via IW#addIndices.
>>> 
>>> If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next week.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Ignacio
>>> 
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Adrien
> 

Reply via email to