I updated the Solr's release announcement so there is no changes. I think the Lucene's bug fix is not relevant for Solr.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > If RC1 is released with a non-working SOLR-14359, then please change > Solr’s release announcement. Not sure whether the Lucene-bugfix is valid > for Solr users, in that case it can be highlighted instead? > > Jan > > 7. apr. 2020 kl. 10:13 skrev Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com>: > > Here are the drafts for the release notes, let me know if there is > something you wish to change: > > Lucene: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645634&draftShareId=e835ddb5-3bb9-4b33-b6ad-1770e0a95327&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1586247034772 > > Solr: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645636&draftShareId=c4a8eb5f-08d0-40db-a877-b94adb383061&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1586247001694 > > As I reminder I am planning to build the first RC tomorrow, Wednesday > April 8th. > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Jan, I see SOLR-14359 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> has already been back >> ported to branch 8.5, I am ok with SOLR-14317 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> backporting as well. >> I am planning to build the first RC this coming Wednesday. Let me know if >> that works for you. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:25 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Also this coould be a backport candidate: SOLR-14317 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> HttpClusterStateProvider >>> throws exception when only one node down >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 22:29 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>: >>> >>> I plan to merge this to branch_8_5 >>> >>> *SOLR-14359 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> Admin >>> UI has "Select an option" for collections and cores drop-downs* >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 14:15 skrev jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> +1, thanks Ignacio. >>> I merged the fix for LUCENE-9300 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9300> and backported to >>> the 8.5 branch. >>> >>> Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 21:48, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>>> My general take on this is that it's ok to upgrade a dependency in a >>>> patch release if the dependency upgrade itself is a new patch release of >>>> the same minor version. The changelog of Tika 1.24 seems to include not >>>> only bug fixes but also some enhancements[1], so I'd rather do a 8.6 >>>> release in the near future than backport this dependency upgrade to 8.5. >>>> >>>> [1] https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:33 PM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Should we consider backporting SOLR-14367 (the most recent Tika >>>>> upgrade)? It addresses a CVE in Tika, and while I think we usually avoid >>>>> changing 3rd party component versions in patch releases, but maybe we >>>>> should in this case? The upgrade also looks like it was pretty >>>>> straightforward (drop-in replacement). >>>>> >>>>> Cassandra >>>>> On Apr 2, 2020, 12:47 PM -0500, Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com>, >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The main >>>>> motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a serious >>>>> bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via >>>>> IW#addIndices. >>>>> >>>>> If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next >>>>> week. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Ignacio >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Adrien >>>> >>> >>> >>> >
