Personally I feel the burden of proof should not be why they should be split up, but the other way - "what arguments can be made for keeping them together?"
I would be curious if people can make the argument for keeping them together... -Doug On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:29 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:28 PM Gézapeti Cseh <gezap...@apache.org> wrote: > > I think separating the git repository and even the release schedules could >> be done under the same TLP. >> > It would solve most of the technical issues reflected in the first mail >> and there would be more time and data to >> > > Hmm that is technically true, and in fact that is the way it was before 10 > years ago: Solr was a sub-project of Apache Lucene. > > But that is not the proposal here. > > Lucene and Solr have become such major efforts, in developers and users > eyes and keyboard effort/time, that they really are very different entities > now. TLP makes sense to me for each project. > >> > >> see if creating Apache Solr again is something the PMC would want to do >> > > Hmm, just to clarify, this is not an "again" sort of situation: Solr was > not a top-level project before. It was and still is a sub-project of > Apache Lucene. > > And the proposal is to now split it out as its own (new) top-level > project, Apache Solr. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > -- *Doug Turnbull **| CTO* | OpenSource Connections <http://opensourceconnections.com>, LLC | 240.476.9983 Author: Relevant Search <http://manning.com/turnbull>; Contributor: *AI Powered Search <http://aipoweredsearch.com>* This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
