On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:37 PM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I read “promotion to TLP” as if this was some achievement that needs to > be celebrated now. > > I honestly believe it is an achievement for a project to receive > top-level status. It's a sign of having a community of users, > committers and processes mature enough to empower its further > development. > My point is that this is not something new. Solr is a mature product and has had the community and process in place for a long time. > > > It’s technically true that Solr is a subproject of Lucene, but so is > Lucene Core, and I don’t see Lucene Core being promoted to TLP > > I don't think these are same magnitude components, sorry. I can name > at least a few projects that depend on Lucene alone (core + extras) > and I can name companies using Solr as a product but I can't name a > single project that would depend on lucene-core alone (without any > other lucene-* dependency). Maybe there is something like this but > it's definitely an outlier example of a typical use case. > If you go to lucene.apache.org, you'll see three things: Lucene Core (Lucene with all it's modules), Solr and PyLucene. That's what I mean. > > Dawid > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
