Megan:

There are a number of tests that have been flagged by some devs
that, no matter what, should _not_ be annotated with BadApple or
AwaitsFix and that’s just a list to remind me what they are.


It’s not much of a deal, though, because I’m not doing much annotating
lately. The original process was that I’d annotate tests that had failed every
week for the last 4 weeks. Partly to get people’s attention, partly to make a
record. There were tests that would come and go, so you’ll see in places\
a bunch of dates associated with an annotation. Those indicate that it’d be
bad, then OK for 4 or more weeks, then bad again which I thought was
useful to see just how rarely some tests failed.

Best,
Erick

> On Jul 6, 2020, at 1:47 PM, Megan Carey <mca...@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Erick,
> 
> I'm wondering what is meant by "DO NOT ANNOTATE LIST" at the start of the 
> report? Better yet, can you please link to the scraping tool used to generate 
> the report?
> 
> Thank you!
> Megan
> 
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:07 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Holding fairly steady, but IDK whether Hoss’ scraping is getting data from 
> Uwe’s machines, thought I saw an e-mail go by about that.
> 
> this is the first report where the suppresswarnings stats mean anything.
> 
> Full report attached:
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to