+1 to the change. I think the last issue remaining is Jan's Zookeeper client port fix. After that is merged I will start with the release.
- Houston On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:12 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ishan suggested I also supply the slight clarification to ref guide build > docs to 8_6 https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1704 if you want > to include it. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:25 PM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Both of those look good to include! >> >> Ill keep an eye out for when they get resolved. >> >> - Houston >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:16 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Can we include SOLR-11611 for 8.6.1? The patch should be simple to test >>> out (with someone having a Windows machine and VM) and seems like a good >>> one to fix. >>> I marked it as a 8.6.1 bug, but please feel free to unmark it (or I can >>> do so, if you tell me to) if you feel otherwise. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Came back from holiday and fixed >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14671 >>>> Can we include it in 8.6.1? >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>> 27. jul. 2020 kl. 22:56 skrev Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> Added upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff. >>>> >>>> Will begin the release process tomorrow when my GPG Keys will be >>>> refreshed in all of the apache systems. >>>> >>>> - Houston >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Doc changes are in. Still having trouble with that one link in 8x but >>>>> just fixed it locally and made sure not to push that change. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 8x docs not building smoothly on my laptop... (without changes) >>>>>> troubleshooting, checking deps listed in README.adoc, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM Houston Putman < >>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the upgrade notes >>>>>>> for the autoscaling stuff anyways. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs that I >>>>>>>> didn't actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had >>>>>>>> intended to >>>>>>>> verify that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). Doing that now, and >>>>>>>> suspect that we probably want to include it for 8.6.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have >>>>>>>>> upgraded? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Looking at >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90 >>>>>>>>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut to fix >>>>>>>>>> this issue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next week I'm >>>>>>>>>> going to push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits reverted >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> some additional documentation on reverting the defaulted autoscaling >>>>>>>>>> policy >>>>>>>>>> from 8.6.0. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in doing so >>>>>>>>>>> because Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought it >>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>> better if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them of the >>>>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>> right away anyway. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, < >>>>>>>>>>> ilans...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying of the >>>>>>>>>>>> issue? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> a >>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I volunteer >>>>>>>>>>>>> to do the release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if users have >>>>>>>>>>>>> to take an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most users >>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't >>>>>>>>>>>>> upgraded to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we will make >>>>>>>>>>>>> life easier >>>>>>>>>>>>> for everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is released. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma < >>>>>>>>>>>>> a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma < >>>>>>>>>>>>> a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users upgrading >>>>>>>>>>>>> from 8.6 to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch added a >>>>>>>>>>>>> default autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and then >>>>>>>>>>>>> 8.6.1, does >>>>>>>>>>>>> the default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? If >>>>>>>>>>>>> so we >>>>>>>>>>>>> probably want to include instructions in the release notes on how >>>>>>>>>>>>> to fix >>>>>>>>>>>>> this issue once upgrading. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > - Houston >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>>>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression identified in 8.6.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious enough to >>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant an >>>>>>>>>>>>> immediate bug fix release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, I'll be >>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to volunteer for this release owning to some other >>>>>>>>>>>>> commitments, >>>>>>>>>>>>> however Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able to >>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer for >>>>>>>>>>>>> this post 27th. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding this? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Atri >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Atri >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Atri >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>> >>>> >>>> > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > http://www.the111shift.com (play) >
