Can I cherry-pick SOLR-14634: Limit the HTTP security headers to "/solr" end point ?
if the build is not already made? On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:14 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a PR up: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1706 reviews > welcome; I won't merge to a release branch without one. > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:43 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Thanks Jan and David. >> >> I think that's the last issue. So after you commit it I'll begin the release >> process. >> >> - Houston >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:29 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9443 >>> This regression on the highlighter is trivial; just revert a commit to a >>> file and maybe suppress a warning. I'll get this into 8.6.1 today. >>> >>> ~ David Smiley >>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:04 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Merged! >>>> >>>> 28. jul. 2020 kl. 23:22 skrev Houston Putman <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> +1 to the change. >>>> >>>> I think the last issue remaining is Jan's Zookeeper client port fix. After >>>> that is merged I will start with the release. >>>> >>>> - Houston >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:12 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ishan suggested I also supply the slight clarification to ref guide build >>>>> docs to 8_6 https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1704 if you want >>>>> to include it. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:25 PM Houston Putman <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Both of those look good to include! >>>>>> >>>>>> Ill keep an eye out for when they get resolved. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Houston >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:16 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can we include SOLR-11611 for 8.6.1? The patch should be simple to test >>>>>>> out (with someone having a Windows machine and VM) and seems like a >>>>>>> good one to fix. >>>>>>> I marked it as a 8.6.1 bug, but please feel free to unmark it (or I can >>>>>>> do so, if you tell me to) if you feel otherwise. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Came back from holiday and fixed >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14671 >>>>>>>> Can we include it in 8.6.1? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 27. jul. 2020 kl. 22:56 skrev Houston Putman <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Added upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will begin the release process tomorrow when my GPG Keys will be >>>>>>>> refreshed in all of the apache systems. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Doc changes are in. Still having trouble with that one link in 8x but >>>>>>>>> just fixed it locally and made sure not to push that change. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 8x docs not building smoothly on my laptop... (without changes) >>>>>>>>>> troubleshooting, checking deps listed in README.adoc, etc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM Houston Putman >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the upgrade notes >>>>>>>>>>> for the autoscaling stuff anyways. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs that I >>>>>>>>>>>> didn't actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had >>>>>>>>>>>> intended to verify that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). >>>>>>>>>>>> Doing that now, and suspect that we probably want to include it >>>>>>>>>>>> for 8.6.1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have >>>>>>>>>>>>> > upgraded? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90 >>>>>>>>>>>>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut to fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next week I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reverted and some additional documentation on reverting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> defaulted autoscaling policy from 8.6.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in doing so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be better if he did this. But, it makes sense to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inform them of the issue right away anyway. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I volunteer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > to do the release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if users have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > to take an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > users haven't upgraded to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > patch now we will make life easier for everyone that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > upgrades between now and when 8.7 is released. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users upgrading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > from 8.6 to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch added a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > default autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > and then 8.6.1, does the default autoscaling policy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > stay once they have upgraded? If so we probably want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > to include instructions in the release notes on how to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > fix this issue once upgrading. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > - Houston >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression identified in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> 8.6.0 release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> serious enough to warrant an immediate bug fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, I'll be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> unable to volunteer for this release owning to some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> other commitments, however Andrzej mentioned in Slack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> that he might be able to volunteer for this post 27th. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding this? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Atri >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Atri >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Atri >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>> >>>> -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
