For some reason, 8.6.0 docker images are not generated and pushed. After the 8.6.1 release, can we ensure that the docker images are pushed? Any idea how does that happen, generally? Can we add this as a step in the release process please?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 2:47 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote: > The first RC has been pushed and the vote has been started. > > Release note drafts can be found here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseNote861 > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote861 > > Any changes can be made there directly. > > - Houston > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:51 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, I'm finalizing the 8.6.1 release, so please do not push any commits >> unless there is a large bug we have not yet identified. >> >> I'll be sending out the RC1 later today. >> >> - Houston >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:41 AM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This seems like a patch release for targeting a specific blocking issue >>> in 8.6. 8.7 would seem over arching? >>> >>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 20:33, Houston Putman <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I started the process last night. Is there a reason why you want this >>>> to make it into 8.6.1 and not 8.7? >>>> >>>> - Houston >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 8:13 AM Noble Paul <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can I cherry-pick SOLR-14634: Limit the HTTP security headers to >>>>> "/solr" end point ? >>>>> >>>>> if the build is not already made? >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:14 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > I have a PR up: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1706 >>>>> reviews welcome; I won't merge to a release branch without one. >>>>> > ~ David Smiley >>>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:43 AM Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks Jan and David. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I think that's the last issue. So after you commit it I'll begin >>>>> the release process. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> - Houston >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:29 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9443 >>>>> >>> This regression on the highlighter is trivial; just revert a >>>>> commit to a file and maybe suppress a warning. I'll get this into 8.6.1 >>>>> today. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> ~ David Smiley >>>>> >>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:04 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Merged! >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> 28. jul. 2020 kl. 23:22 skrev Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> +1 to the change. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> I think the last issue remaining is Jan's Zookeeper client port >>>>> fix. After that is merged I will start with the release. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> - Houston >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:12 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ishan suggested I also supply the slight clarification to ref >>>>> guide build docs to 8_6 >>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1704 if you want to >>>>> include it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:25 PM Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Both of those look good to include! >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Ill keep an eye out for when they get resolved. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> - Houston >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:16 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Can we include SOLR-11611 for 8.6.1? The patch should be >>>>> simple to test out (with someone having a Windows machine and VM) and >>>>> seems >>>>> like a good one to fix. >>>>> >>>>>>> I marked it as a 8.6.1 bug, but please feel free to unmark it >>>>> (or I can do so, if you tell me to) if you feel otherwise. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jan Høydahl < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Came back from holiday and fixed >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14671 >>>>> >>>>>>>> Can we include it in 8.6.1? >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> 27. jul. 2020 kl. 22:56 skrev Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Added upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff. >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Will begin the release process tomorrow when my GPG Keys will >>>>> be refreshed in all of the apache systems. >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Doc changes are in. Still having trouble with that one link >>>>> in 8x but just fixed it locally and made sure not to push that change. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Gus Heck < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 8x docs not building smoothly on my laptop... (without >>>>> changes) troubleshooting, checking deps listed in README.adoc, etc. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the >>>>> upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff anyways. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs >>>>> that I didn't actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had >>>>> intended to verify that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). Doing that >>>>> now, and suspect that we probably want to include it for 8.6.1 >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they >>>>> have upgraded? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at >>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90 >>>>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut >>>>> to fix this issue. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next >>>>> week I'm going to push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits >>>>> reverted and some additional documentation on reverting the defaulted >>>>> autoscaling policy from 8.6.0. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in >>>>> doing so because Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought >>>>> it >>>>> would be better if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them of the >>>>> issue right away anyway. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying >>>>> of the issue? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma < >>>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I >>>>> volunteer to do the release. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if >>>>> users have to take an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most >>>>> users haven't upgraded to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we will >>>>> make life easier for everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is >>>>> released. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users >>>>> upgrading from 8.6 to >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > +1 >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch >>>>> added a default autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and then >>>>> 8.6.1, >>>>> does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? If so we >>>>> probably want to include instructions in the release notes on how to fix >>>>> this issue once upgrading. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > - Houston >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan >>>>> Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression >>>>> identified in 8.6.0 release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious >>>>> enough >>>>> to warrant an immediate bug fix release. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, >>>>> I'll be unable to volunteer for this release owning to some other >>>>> commitments, however Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able to >>>>> volunteer for this post 27th. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding >>>>> this? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Regards, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Regards, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Atri >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Regards, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Atri >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Atri >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Concerted >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>> >>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Noble Paul >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Atri >>> Apache Concerted >>> >>
