Cool! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:55 AM Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote: > SOLR-14728 supports sub-second performance on joins with more than 1 > million values from the from index. Nice for access control. > > > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:49 AM Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This ticket will shed some light: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14728 >> >> >> I think I'm planning using a different approach to distribute tha ACL's >> to all shards. >> >> >> >> >> Joel Bernstein >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:18 AM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sounds like complex ACLs based on group memberships that use graph >>> queries ? that would require local ACL's... >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 5:56 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> This seems like an XY problem. Would it be possible to describe the >>>> original problem that led you to this solution (in the prototype)? Also, do >>>> you think folks at solr-users@ list would have more ideas related to >>>> this usecase and cross posting there would help? >>>> >>>> On Tue, 11 Aug, 2020, 1:43 am David Smiley, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are you sure you need the docs in the same shard when maybe you could >>>>> assume a core exists on each node and then do a query-time join? >>>>> >>>>> ~ David Smiley >>>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:34 PM Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have a situation where I'd like to have the standard compositeId >>>>>> router in place for a collection. But, I'd like certain documents (ACL >>>>>> documents) to be duplicated on each shard in the collection. To achieve >>>>>> the >>>>>> level of access control performance and scalability I'm looking for I >>>>>> need >>>>>> the ACL records to be in the same core as the main documents. >>>>>> >>>>>> I put together a prototype where the compositeId router accepted >>>>>> implicit routing parameters and it worked in my testing. Before I open a >>>>>> ticket suggesting this approach I wonder what other people thought the >>>>>> best >>>>>> approach would be to accomplish this goal. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>> >>
