Sure Andrzej, I *sincerely* apologize. I felt Houston and Gus could've
received some more help from you while they were working on the release.
But, I take my words back.
I know that you care deeply about performance (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14691), and please accept all my
help whenever you need.
I shall focus on making automated performance testing a higher priority.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:26 PM Andrzej Białecki <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 12 Aug 2020, at 07:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> > Whatever we do or not do is imperfect.  I hope some "mandate" doesn't
> stop progress.
> > We don't go changing code just for the heck of it; we do it for a
> variety of matters.
>
> We sometimes do: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12845.
>
>
> This is just silly … I didn’t make this change just for the heck of it,
> we’ve had long discussions on Slack about this, so let’s stop being
> facetious, it doesn’t help. I am sorry it resulted in a regression, the
> scale of which wasn’t apparent in my manual tests, nor in unit tests.
>
> I don't want to stop progress, but I want to avoid situations where
> someone commits an issue (e.g. SOLR-12845), it causes a massive regression
> (SOLR-14665), and others have to come and fix the situation (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14706 and releases) with very
> little help or support from the original committer. Just because there was
> no mandate in place, hours and hours of effort has already been wasted on
> that issue, let aside the users who are suffering as well.
>
>
> To clarify, immediately after the problem was identified I volunteered to
> fix the problem and do a release a week later after our conversation. The
> reason for the delay was that I was away and in no position to immediately
> test the fix and do a release. In the meantime Houston volunteered to do it
> instead. Anyone interested can check the facts in Slack archives. So let’s
> not suggest I was uncooperative just for the heck of it, or because I
> didn’t care, ok?
>
> —
>
> Andrzej Białecki
>
>

Reply via email to