> You're left with the <solrhome>/filestore/ dir to put there what you want in 
> standalone mode.
That's fine by me as that's effectively what "userfiles" provides now.
The main difference I imagine is that the 'filestore' directory won't
exist at all in standalone? In that case standalone users will have to
know where to create the dir if they want to reference 'filestore'
files in their streaming expressions.  But that's not all that much
more to ask I guess.

I'm curious - is the filestore unimplemented in standalone because no
one prioritized it, or is there a specific technical blocker?

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:24 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> The "userfiles" thing is merely a directory.  There's no CRUD API on it.  
> Even if the CRUD API of the file store isn't active in standalone -- I think 
> that doesn't matter.  You're left with the <solrhome>/filestore/ dir to put 
> there what you want in standalone mode.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:00 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Standalone isn't supported.
>>
>> We need to transition away from the standalone mode and get rid of it 
>> completely.
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Sep, 2020, 7:50 pm Jason Gerlowski, <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't know much about the new package/file-store, but it does sound
>>> like a good replacement for 'userfiles' (which Eric is right- is
>>> pretty awkward to work with).
>>>
>>> My only concerns with using the filestore would be around its
>>> availability.  Is it enabled by default (or will it be in an upcoming
>>> release)?  Does it work in standalone as well as SolrCloud?  If the
>>> answer to those questions are both "yes", then it makes sense to me as
>>> a replacement on the face of things.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:39 AM Eric Pugh
>>> <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1.  I’ve found the user files really useful when doing things with 
>>> > streaming, but it’s also awkward to reach to put files into.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sep 25, 2020, at 8:47 AM, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yes.  And I think it's high time that coreRootDirectory default to 
>>> > <solrhome>/something (e.g. "cores")
>>> >
>>> > ~ David Smiley
>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:42 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch 
>>> > <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Would that file store also be under solr.home? Because if it is and
>>> >> the user can upload core.property into it as well as other things that
>>> >> core discovery will then load bypassing security....
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >>   Alex.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 08:32, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm looking to see that we can deprecate "userfiles" and remove for 9.0
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Solr has a "userfiles" directory under Solr home that Jason added in 
>>> >> > some issue relating to streaming expressions accessing a local file.  
>>> >> > I bet only a few of you have even heard of it.  I think the "File 
>>> >> > Store" that came along with the package manager obsoletes "userfiles". 
>>> >> >  If you have not heard of the file store either, I wouldn't be 
>>> >> > surprised -- it's new and it's name was changed from "package store" 
>>> >> > last minute, since it's general purpose, with "packages" being a 
>>> >> > directory at the root of the file store for packages.  It's documented 
>>> >> > as the "package store" (should be renamed) on the package manager 
>>> >> > internals doc: 
>>> >> > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/package-manager-internals.html#package-store
>>> >> > However IMO it's worthy of its own doc page as it's a very useful new 
>>> >> > component of the Solr platform.  It can store "user files" (hence 
>>> >> > obsoleting the userfiles dir), ML models, or basically any file that's 
>>> >> > too large to put in ZK.  I'd be nice if SolrResourceLoader could 
>>> >> > resolve resources from it -- an issue for another day.  That would be 
>>> >> > another avenue of use separate from the configSet.  You can already 
>>> >> > upload single files to the file store :-)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ~ David Smiley
>>> >> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>> >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>> >>
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > _______________________
>>> > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
>>> > http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
>>> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
>>> > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
>>> > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of 
>>> > whether attachments are marked as such.
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to