Definitely don't remove in 8.x! > A single file configset upload would require the user to reload the collection, so it isn't better than managed resources.
Do you view that as a substantial point in favor of managed-resources? I view that as a trivial matter, and one I prefer to automagic and potentially premature reload if there are additional edits to be done (e.g. query-elevation or other word lists). ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 5:46 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < [email protected]> wrote: > > * Nobody knows how it works. It's unsupported > It is supported and documented: > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/managed-resources.html > > > * RESTlet dependency > > * Cannot be secured using standard permissions > > * It's extremely complex for the functionality it offers. > > I agree. Whatever alternative we build should address these, before we > consider removing managed resources. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The managed resources is the only reasonable way to upload synonyms on >> the fly for users today. A single file configset upload would require the >> user to reload the collection, so it isn't better than managed resources. I >> would not recommend we remove the functionality without first building a >> suitable alternative. I agree that the feature isn't built using proper >> framework or proper APIs, but it is a feature that works well. >> >> Usually, I support throwing features out even without existence of an >> alternative, but I do that for non essential features. In my mind, ability >> to manage synonyms elegantly is an essential feature for a search engine. >> >> On Wed, 30 Sep, 2020, 2:44 pm Uwe Schindler, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Please don't do this. >>> >>> In short: remove restlet stuff from master. Pull requests on master are >>> executed with Gradle on GitHub hardware. >>> >>> Ivy stuff in 8.x is built in more or less persistent servers and there >>> is no issue. >>> >>> What's the problem? >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>> Am September 30, 2020 8:59:06 AM UTC schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> [email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Can we discuss this with ASF and get an exception for this? >>>> >>>> On Wed, 30 Sep, 2020, 11:57 am Dawid Weiss, <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We can't have or redistribute binaries in ASL sources - that's my >>>>> understanding. >>>>> >>>>> Dawid >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:02 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Can we pull in the jar inside our codebase? >>>>> > >>>>> > On Wed, 30 Sep, 2020, 1:19 am Dawid Weiss, <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> We can upgrade if it doesn't break anything... which I can't >>>>> guarantee. ;) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Dawid >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> Uwe Schindler >>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen >>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>> >>
