I saw these issues but I didn’t find the blob store deprecation decision to
reference when closing them.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 6:59 AM Eric Pugh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Mike,
>
> There are five that come up:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12501?jql=project%20%3D%20SOLR%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20component%20%3D%20blobstore
>
>
>
> On Oct 28, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is done for CDCR and Velocity.
>
> I don't really understand which parts of HDFS are deprecated and which
> ones are staying (this is not a request for somebody to explain it to me),
> so I left that one alone.
>
> If you link me to the blobstore deprecation JIRA, then I can close those
> as well. I think I have the mechanics of this figured out by now.
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:36 PM Eric Pugh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Mike!
>>
>> While you are at it, is “blobstore” also a candidate for this?
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2020, at 4:30 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> That's a good point, David. I'll make sure to include that.
>>
>> @Eric - I'll handle the Velocity issues for you as well.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:59 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> In these bulk changes, please add a comment pointing to the deprecation.
>>>
>>> ~ David Smiley
>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:34 AM Eric Pugh <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hopefully not hijacking your thread….  I ran the report for the
>>>> Velocity contrib module, and wondered if we should do the same thing there?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6702?jql=project%20%3D%20SOLR%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20component%20%3D%20%22contrib%20-%20Velocity%22
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 28, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Devs,
>>>>
>>>> Just a heads up that since Solr CDCR is on the slate for
>>>> deprecation/removal, I'm going to clean up some JIRA issues related to it,
>>>> namely
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SOLR%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20component%20%3D%20CDCR
>>>>
>>>> There's a few that I'll leave untouched, like SOLR-10091 and
>>>> SOLR-14611, since they are not related to the current implementation of
>>>> CDCR, but the rest should be closed as Won't Fix. I'll try to do this
>>>> without spamming the mailing list, but apologize pre-emptively if this
>>>> generated a bunch of traffic.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________
>>>> *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467
>>>> | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
>>>> <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to
>>>> be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
>>>> of whether attachments are marked as such.
>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________
>> *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467
>> | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
>> <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
>> of whether attachments are marked as such.
>>
>>
> _______________________
> *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467
> | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
> <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> of whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>

Reply via email to