-1 for RC1.

The fix has been merged into 8x and 8.8 branches so we should be able to
respin and start another vote.

Thanks for the fix, Tim!

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:42 PM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:

> -1
>
> I have been able to reproduce the regression that Anshum found, and would
> like to change my vote accordingly.
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:31 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15097
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:28 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> While testing the artifacts some more, I realized that the cluster graph
>>> doesn't show up on the admin UI any more.
>>>
>>> I started the cluster with -e cloud -noprompt, and the getting started
>>> collection was created successfully. The clusterstate, as well as the admin
>>> UI confirm that.
>>>
>>> I also tried creating a collection using the admin API, which was
>>> successful, but the graph didn't reflect that either.
>>>
>>> I've tested this using both Safari and Firefox, and it's clearly not a
>>> browser issue.
>>>
>>> Considering that the users rely on the graph, I think we might need to
>>> fix and respin this.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:51 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC1-rev737cb9c49b08f6e3964c1e8a80132da3c764e027
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC1-rev737cb9c49b08f6e3964c1e8a80132da3c764e027
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2021-01-22 17:00
>>>> UTC.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>> ----
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>

-- 
Anshum Gupta

Reply via email to