In addition: we test for compatibility with Java 17 (both Lucene and Solr), so consumer is still able to use any version and has enough flexibility.
Uwe Am 13. September 2021 18:52:53 UTC schrieb Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>: >I agree with Uwe and Robert. JDK11, then the min bar should move if there >is something that brings value (be it performance, LTS or some other >attractive option). > >Dawid > >On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 8:15 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1, I think the main thing to watch out for is project panama. If we >> get a 18.x/19.x release with non-incubating APIs, I think it makes >> sense to create a new major Lucene version. Even if it isn't an >> OpenJDK LTS release. It could really change a lot, especially >> regarding hotspots in the code such as postings/dv compression. So it >> would be great to allow a lot of folks to make a "take two" on these >> algorithms with vectorization in mind. This is just my opinion. >> >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 2:10 PM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > There are no good reasons to do Java 17 and it is way too early. >> > >> > >> > >> > Reagrding real optimizations, Lucene 17 is unfortunately not containing >> Project Panama or Vector API, so it looks more like Java 18/19 is a good >> candidate as a new minimum at a later stage. >> > >> > >> > >> > I’d release Lucene 9 with Java 11 (which is LTS) and then decide later >> if we update to some post-17 version to get the new vector and panama APIs >> (vector search, SIMD and also MMapDirectory v2). If we do this, we should >> simply release Lucene 10. >> > >> > >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- >> > >> > Uwe Schindler >> > >> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > >> > https://www.thetaphi.de >> > >> > eMail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Mike Drob <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 8:00 PM >> > To: Solr/Lucene Dev <[email protected]> >> > Subject: Java 11/17 Version Matrix >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi Devs, >> > >> > >> > >> > What are our thoughts on Java 11 and 17 version compatibility going >> forward for Lucene 9? Will we support both? If so, would Java 11 support >> likely continue for the entire 9.x release line? >> > >> > >> > >> > Is there a JIRA tracking this? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Mike >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de
