Ah to add: OpenJDK releases do not vary between each other. The bugfix version numbers should be aligned.
It may only happen that a specific vendor patches more security fixes in or adds optional features (like the Temurin ones have Shenandoah GC, Oracle's not). The tools like javac or javadoc get bugfixes, but those are common to all vendors. Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 11:21 AM > To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Lucene 9.2 release > > Hi Alan, > > I know the probem: This is the JDK 11 General Availability release (the first one > that came out) and it is buggy to hell (also Lucene crashes hotspot with that > one). This also has known issues with javadocs which were fixed in later bugfix > versions. > > I think what you should do: Go To Eclipse Temurin / Adoptopen-JDK and > download the latest OpenJDK 11.0.15 release. > > We could maybe add some checks in the Gradle Build using > java.lang.System.Version.current() class and check major/minor version for > minimum requirements. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alan Woodward <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 10:49 AM > > To: Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Lucene 9.2 release > > > > $ /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java - > > version > > > > openjdk version "11" 2018-09-25 > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11+28) > > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11+28, mixed mode) > > > > > > > On 18 May 2022, at 09:35, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Alan, what's the exact JDK vendor/ release number you used that had > > > this problem? If we can reproduce it then we'd know where to look > > > (bisect until we know javadoc works correctly). > > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:33 AM Dawid Weiss > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I'd like to draw attention to my second question while we are still here... > > should we limit the OpenJDK distribution (for building)? My worry here is, > that > > minor versions could depend on the distributor. > > >> > > >> This is a valid concern but it'd take some trial and error to verify > > >> which version numbers are used by packaging openjdk for various > > >> releases. Realistically, the JDK part (standard library) is nearly the > > >> same in all/ most of them? The least that could be done is to apply > > >> the restriction to just a particular vendor/ release and emit a > > >> warning for unrecognized ones. > > >> > > >> Dawid > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
