I think this release is the first time I’ve used Java 11 since 2019, yes!
I’ll get the latest AdoptOpenJDK version and try and persuade my Mac to use it... > On 18 May 2022, at 10:19, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Living in the past, aren't we? :) > > D. > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:49 AM Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> $ /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java >> -version >> >> openjdk version "11" 2018-09-25 >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11+28) >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11+28, mixed mode) >> >> >>> On 18 May 2022, at 09:35, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Alan, what's the exact JDK vendor/ release number you used that had >>> this problem? If we can reproduce it then we'd know where to look >>> (bisect until we know javadoc works correctly). >>> >>> D. >>> >>> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:33 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'd like to draw attention to my second question while we are still >>>>> here... should we limit the OpenJDK distribution (for building)? My worry >>>>> here is, that minor versions could depend on the distributor. >>>> >>>> This is a valid concern but it'd take some trial and error to verify >>>> which version numbers are used by packaging openjdk for various >>>> releases. Realistically, the JDK part (standard library) is nearly the >>>> same in all/ most of them? The least that could be done is to apply >>>> the restriction to just a particular vendor/ release and emit a >>>> warning for unrecognized ones. >>>> >>>> Dawid >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
