Hi Christine, Including 13014 seems reasonable, and the issue appears quite severe.
Let’s see if we can get 13014 reviewed and merged in the next day or two. If so, then it seems reasonable to include. -Chris. > On 23 Jan 2024, at 18:30, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > > Thanks Chris for volunteering! > > I wonder if https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13014 might be a candidate > for pulling into the release too? > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 01/23/24 17:37:21 UTC > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: The need for a Lucene 9.9.2 release > > Hi, > > We’ve encounter a serious issue with the recent Lucene 9.9.1 release, which > warrants a 9.9.2. > > The issue is a NPE when sampling for quantization in > Lucene99HnswScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat [1]. Thankfully Ben has already > resolved the issue, and backported it to the appropriate branches. > > I don’t see any other potential issues that would warrant being pulled into > this release. > > I’m happy to be Release Manager for 9.9.2 (given my recent experience on > 9.9.1). I’ll start the release process tomorrow and notify this list when > artifacts are ready. > > Thanks, > -Chris. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13027 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
