Let's do it. I am gonna respin with Alan's adaptive work tomorrow. On Mon, Feb 16, 2026, 7:07 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ben, > > I have another last minute bug fix in lucene polygon tessellator: > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15700. I wonder if it is ok for you > to add it to the release. > > Thanks, > > Ignacio > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 2:18 PM Benjamin Trent <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thank you Alan. Have we verified the multi-magnitude regression is fixed? >> >> I am happy to respin. >> >> Sorry y'all for yet another RC failing. This release is getting >> complicated :). But better to respin than release and require a bugfix!. >> >> This RC has not passed. >> >> Will create a new RC after confirming fix. >> >> Thank you all for your patience. >> >> We will get 10.4 soon, I promise!!! >> >> >> Ben Trent >> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 4:12 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I’ve merged https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15696 and backported >>> to branch_10x and branch_10_4 >>> >>> On 11 Feb 2026, at 13:55, Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We’ve found a serious regression in the performance of sorted queries >>> against SortedSetDocValues fields with skippers enabled, which looks like >>> it’s due to the change to use DocValuesRangeIterator as a competitive >>> iterator. I’m working on a fix now, and should hopefully have something up >>> in a couple of hours, but I think this will need a re-spin. >>> >>> - Alan W >>> >>> On 10 Feb 2026, at 21:15, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> SUCCESS! [1:51:58.269208] >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 5:43 PM Mayya Sharipova < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> SUCCESS! [0:46:50.723810] >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 11:54 AM Chris Hegarty < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> SUCCESS! [1:24:45.731767] >>>>> >>>>> -Chris. >>>>> >>>>> > On 10 Feb 2026, at 16:15, Shubham Chaudhary <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > +1 (non-binding) >>>>> > >>>>> > SUCCESS! [0:53:19.960007] >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 7:02 AM Shubham Sharma < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > +1 (non-binding) >>>>> > >>>>> > SUCCESS! [1:06:49.430942] >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 11:54 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > +1 (binding) >>>>> > >>>>> > SUCCESS! [1:18:45.543439] >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 6:52 AM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > +1 (binding) >>>>> > >>>>> > The smoke tester is happy. >>>>> > SUCCESS! [1:23:12.616392] >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 3:54 PM Benjamin Trent <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > Hey. y'all, >>>>> > >>>>> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 10.4.0 >>>>> > >>>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.4.0-RC2-rev-b46b0faf340554e8210ad41420f271439b907a24 >>>>> > >>>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>>> > >>>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>>> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.4.0-RC2-rev-b46b0faf340554e8210ad41420f271439b907a24 >>>>> > >>>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2026-02-13 >>>>> 00:00 UTC. >>>>> > >>>>> > [ ] +1 approve >>>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>> > >>>>> > Here is my +1 >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks! >>>>> > >>>>> > Ben Trent >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Anshum Gupta >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>
