[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13125313#comment-13125313 ]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2823: ----------------------------------- This could look like: {code:xml} <updateRequestProcessorChain name="crawl"> <processor class="com.example.MyCrawlSpecificProcessor" /> <processor ref="langid" /> <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> </updateRequestProcessorChain> <updateRequestProcessorChain name="cms"> <processor class="com.example.MyCmsSpecificProcessor" /> <processor ref="langid" /> <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> </updateRequestProcessorChain> <updateProcessors> <processor name="langid" class="solr.LanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessorFactory"> <str name="langid.fl">text,title,subject,description</str> <str name="langid.langField">language_s</str> <str name="langid.fallback">en</str> </processor> </updateProcessors> {code} > Re-use of UpdateProcessor configurations in multiple UpdateChains > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-2823 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2823 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: update > Reporter: Jan Høydahl > Priority: Minor > > When dealing with multiple UpdateChains and Processors, you frequently need > to re-use configuration. Two chains may be equal except for one config > setting in one <processor>. > I propose to allow named processor configs, which can be referenced by name > in the chains. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org