[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13125894#comment-13125894
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2823:
----------------------------------
I don't think it is hyperbolic to suggest that we're marching towards workflow
definitions, something Ant does very well.
Given we're already discussing: a) allowing people to write the actual
processing logic in JS b) creating a standard set of simple processing
functions and c) in this issue wanting to separate function definitions from
workflows, an interpreted DSL sounds like a damn good idea.
> Re-use of UpdateProcessor configurations in multiple UpdateChains
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2823
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2823
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: update
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Minor
>
> When dealing with multiple UpdateChains and Processors, you frequently need
> to re-use configuration. Two chains may be equal except for one config
> setting in one <processor>.
> I propose to allow named processor configs, which can be referenced by name
> in the chains.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
