[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13126246#comment-13126246
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2487:
-----------------------------------
Yep, something like dist-war-no-logging would be fine.
And perhaps a build property "include.in.war" so people can package log4j if
they wish by {{-Dinclude.in.war=log4j-1.2.16.jar,jcl-over-slf4j.jar}}
Feel free to give it a shot, I'll likely not get back to this issue before
after Barcelona
> Do not include slf4j-jdk14 jar in WAR
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2487
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2487
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Build
> Affects Versions: 3.2, 4.0
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Labels: logging, slf4j
> Attachments: SOLR-2487.patch
>
>
> I know we've intentionally bundled slf4j-jdk14-1.5.5.jar in the war to help
> newbies get up and running. But I find myself re-packaging the war for every
> customer when adapting to their choice of logger framework, which is
> counter-productive.
> It would be sufficient to have the jdk-logging binding in example/lib to let
> the example and tutorial still work OOTB but as soon as you deploy solr.war
> to production you're forced to explicitly decide what logging to use.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
