[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13135128#comment-13135128
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3534:
---------------------------------------
My problem is that this backport is almost impossible: Searchable and Searcher
abstract class prevent this from being done.
We have several choices:
- we can heavily break backwards and maybe nuke Searcher and Searchable earlier
- we keep API intact, only call FilteredQuery.weight() from inside
IndexSaercher instead of duplicating code
- close issue as won't fix
Any comments?
> Backport FilteredQuery/IndexSearcher changes to 3.x: Remove filter logic from
> IndexSearcher and delegate to FilteredQuery
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3534
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-1536: We simplified the code in IndexSearcher to no
> longer do the filtering there, instead wrap all Query with FilteredQuery, if
> a non-null filter is given. The conjunction code would then only exist in
> FilteredQuery which makes it easier to maintain. Currently both
> implementations differ in 3.x, in trunk we used the more optimized
> IndexSearcher variant with addition of a simplified in-order conjunction code.
> This issue will backport those changes (without random access bits).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
