[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13135141#comment-13135141
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3534:
-------------------------------------

for the second solution, we get some benefits of cleanup, without breaks right? 
Sounds good to me.
                
> Backport FilteredQuery/IndexSearcher changes to 3.x: Remove filter logic from 
> IndexSearcher and delegate to FilteredQuery
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3534
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-1536: We simplified the code in IndexSearcher to no 
> longer do the filtering there, instead wrap all Query with FilteredQuery, if 
> a non-null filter is given. The conjunction code would then only exist in 
> FilteredQuery which makes it easier to maintain. Currently both 
> implementations differ in 3.x, in trunk we used the more optimized 
> IndexSearcher variant with addition of a simplified in-order conjunction code.
> This issue will backport those changes (without random access bits).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to