[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13154478#comment-13154478
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2772:
--------------------------------
1) The _original_ code was more broken then what we have now, so saying it's 4
times as fast is kind of meaningless.
2) The only issue is not just (positive) years less then 1000, as noted in the
parent issue, there is confusion about how to handle years less then 0001
because of ambiguity in xml dateTime format spec about year "0"
...as i said in the parent issue, unless someone has a better idea, i'm open to
moving towards (correct) hand rolled code -- but we have to figure out what is
"correct" as far as year 0. This particular child issue was just to move
forward with something that worked for year 0001 and above.
> DateField parsing/formatting issues of years 0001-1000
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2772
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2772
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Hoss Man
> Fix For: 3.5, 4.0
>
>
> see parent task for background
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
