Will try to address it. Patches welcome ;-) Busy brushing off my CSS skills...
On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > >> the text I see (tried 3 browsers) is a bit Gray (or faded), and I rather >> read a page with more contrast between the text and the background, more >> clear to my eyes this way, but this is just my personal preference, it seems >> others do not feel that way, so I'm okay with this. Hopefully this is more >> clear now? > > I agree. The body text is tiny and low contrast. Poor accessibility for > anyone with low vision, including normal aging. > > Compare to the current site, which isn't large body text by any measure, but > is bigger and full-contrast. > > Personally, I'd go with a serif font, but that is mostly preference. > Letterforms are more differentiated with serifs, so it is just less work to > read. > > wunder > -- > Walter Underwood > [email protected] > > > -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
